Individual physiological and mitochondrial responses during 12 weeks of intensified exercise
Individual physiological and mitochondrial responses during 12 weeks of intensified exercise
Blog Article
Abstract Aim Observed effects of exercise are highly variable between individuals, and subject‐by‐training interaction (i.
La « connexion hamburger » appliquée à l’Amazonie brésilienne. Décryptage de l’ « effet papillon » entre consumérisme carné et déboisement
.e., individual response variability) is often not estimated.
Here, we measured mitochondrial (citrate synthetase, cytochrome‐c oxidase, succinate dehydrogenase, and mitochondrial copy‐number), performance markers (Wpeak, lactate threshold [LT], and VO2peak), and fiber type proportions/expression (type I, type IIa, and type IIx) in multiple time points during 12‐week of high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) to investigate effects of exercise at the individual level.Methods Sixteen young (age: 33.1 ± 9.
0 years), healthy men (VO2peak 35–60 ml/min/kg and BMI: 26.4 ± 4.2) from the Gene SMART study completed 12‐week of progressive HIIT.
Performance markers and muscle biopsies were collected every 4 weeks.We used mixed‐models and bivariate growth models to quantify individual response and to estimate correlations between variables.Results All performance markers exhibited significant (Wpeak 0.
56 ± 0.33 p = 0.003, LT 0.
37 ± 0.35 p = 0.007, VO2peak 3.
81 ± 6.13 p = 0.02) increases overtime, with subject‐by‐training interaction being present (95% CI: Wpeak 0.
09–0.24, LT 0.06–0.
18, VO2peak 0.27–2.32).
All other measurements did not exhibit significant changes.Fiber type IIa proportions at baseline was significantly associated with all physiological variables (p < 0.05), and citrate synthetase and cytochrome‐c oxidase levels at baseline and overtime (i.
e.
Thinking and acting ‘outside the box’: digital game and production of pedagogical affectations in teacher training
., intercept and slope) presented significant covariance (p < 0.05).
Finally, low correlations between performance and mitochondrial markers were observed.Conclusion We identified a significant subject‐by‐training interaction for the performance markers.While for all other measures within‐subject variability was too large and interindividual differences in training efficacy could not be verified.
Changes in measurements in response to exercise were not correlated, and such disconnection should be further investigated by future studies